Advertisement
Advanced Search

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are potentially important surveillance sites. This study assessed reporting completeness for gonorrhea by hospital and gender and explored reasons for underreporting. A retrospective review was conducted of ED charts from three hospitals for 2 months. Potential gonorrhea cases were identified by history, physical examination, testing, treatment, and diagnostic practices. Cases were divided into those tested only, those treated with or without testing, and those with positive tests. Reporting completeness was assessed for each. Of 936 cases included, 29.0% were tested without treatment and 71% received treatment. One third of treated patients were not tested, and none of these were reported. Two EDs reported cases themselves and reported 75.9% of confirmed cases. There were significant differences in testing and reporting between hospitals and genders. Underreporting of suspected and confirmed gonorrhea cases was common from these EDs. A major cause was physicians treating without testing for confirmation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

Supported by a grant from George Washington University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine's Research Foundation.

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement