Low-energy defibrillation: Safe and effective☆☆☆
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Correspondence
- Address reprint requests to Dr. Lake: Box 238, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.

Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Correspondence
- Address reprint requests to Dr. Lake: Box 238, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine (Cardiology), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Department of Surgery (Thoracic and Cardiovascular), University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
During cardiopulmonary bypass, 150 cardiac surgical patients were prospectively evaluated for the number, energy, current, and success rates of direct current (DC) shocks required to terminate reperfusion ventricular fibrillation (1°) or ventricular fibrillation occurring subsequent to a nonfibrillatory reperfusion rhythm (2°). Thirty-one percent of 1-J shocks and 58% of 2.5-J shocks defibrillated. Above 2.5 J, the defibrillation success rate reached a plateau of 50–60%. Myocardial resistance decreased significantly after the first shock but remained stable during subsequent shocks. Lower defibrillating currents and myocardial resistances than had been previously reported were observed. The feasibility of low-energy defibrillation during cardiopulmonary bypass was therefore documented.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Supported by NIH grant no. 25919 and by Physio Control Corporation, Redmond, Washington.
☆☆Presented in part at the Fifth Purdue Conference on CPR and Defibrillation, West Lafayette, Indiana, September 25–26, 1984, and at the International Anesthesia Research Society meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 15, 1983.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
