Advertisement

Prehospital recognition of AMI using independent nurse/paramedic 12-lead ECG evaluation: Impact on in-hospital times to thrombolysis in a rural community hospital

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Because the benefits from thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are time dependent, multiple strategies have been devised to speed therapy. This study sought to determine whether hospital-based nurse and paramedic advanced life support (ALS) providers could be trained to independently evaluate (sight read) a prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for the presence of AMI as part of a protocol designed to speed in-hospital administration of thrombolytic agents. Providers were required to determine on the basis of a protocol (1) whether or not AMI was present, and (2) whether or not thrombolytic therapy was indicated. Providers then radioed their impression to the emergency department (ED) and initiated a protocol to prepare identified candidates for thrombolysis. The final decision to initiate thrombolytic therapy was made by the ED physician after patient arrival at the hospital. One hundred fifty-five patients with chest pain were studied. Twenty-one (13.5%) were ultimately proven in-hospital to have AMI. Providers were able to recognize AMI in 17 of 21. Four of 21 did not meet ECG criteria for AMI on the field ECG, but were categorized as having a high index of suspicion for AMI by providers. There were no false-positive diagnoses. Fourteen patients (9%) received thrombolytic therapy. In-hospital times to administration of thrombolytic therapy decreased to an average of 22 ± 13.8 minutes in the studied group compared with a historical control group average of 51 ± 50 minutes. It is concluded that hospital-based paramedics and nurses can successfully be taught to evaluate (ie, sight read) a prehospital ECG for the presence of AMI with accuracy. A prehospital chest pain protocol using a field ECG can speed in-hospital administration of thrombolytic therapy to the extent that field administration of thrombolytic agents may not significantly improve times to administration of therapy when transport times are similar to those of this study.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D; use, select 'Corporate R&D; Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wilcox RG
        • Olsson CG
        • Skene AM
        • et al.
        Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute myocardial infarction: Anglo-Scandinavian study of early thrombolysis (ASSET).
        Lancet. 1988; 2: 525-530
        • Gruppo Italiano per Io Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico
        Effectivess of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 397-402
        • Verstraete M
        • Bory M
        • Collen D
        • et al.
        Randomized trial of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator versus streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. ECSG.
        Lancet. 1985; 1: 842-847
        • Second International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group
        Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.
        Lancet. 1988; 2: 349-360
        • Cerqueirs M
        • Litwin P
        • Martin J
        • et al.
        Infarct size reduction and preservation of ejection fraction with very early thrombolytic treatment for myocardial infarction; radionuclide results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial.
        Circulation. 1992; 86 ([Abstract]) (suppl 1): 643
        • GISSI
        Longterm effects of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: A final report of the GISSI study.
        Lancet. 1987; 2: 871-874
        • Koren G
        • Weiss AT
        • Hasin Y
        • et al.
        Prevention of myocardial damage in acute myocardial ischemia by early treatment with intravenous streptokinase.
        N Engl J Med. 1985; 313: 1384-1389
        • Fine DG
        • Weiss AT
        • Sapoznikov D
        • et al.
        Importance of early initiation of intravenous streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
        Am J Cardiol. 1986; 58: 411-417
        • Kereiakes DJ
        • Weaver WD
        • Anderson JL
        • et al.
        Time delays in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A tale of eight cities.
        in: Report from the PreHospital Study Group and the Cincinnati Heart Project. 2nd ed. Am Heart J. 120. 1990: 773-780
        • Weiss AT
        • Fine DG
        • Applebaum D
        • et al.
        Prehospital coronary thrombolysis: A new strategy in acute myocardial infarction.
        Chest. 1987; 92: 124-128
        • Applebaum D
        • Weiss AT
        • Koren G
        • et al.
        Feasibility of prehospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.
        Am J Emerg Med. 1986; 4: 201-204
        • Villemant D
        • Barriot P
        • Riou B
        • et al.
        Achievement of thrombolysis at home in cases of acute myocardial infarction.
        Lancet. 1987; 1: 228-229
        • Bossaert LL
        • Demey HE
        • Colemont LJ
        • et al.
        Prehospital thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction with anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex.
        Crit Care Med. 1988; 16: 823-830
        • Castaigne AD
        • Duval AM
        • DuboisRande JL
        • et al.
        Prehospital administration of anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex in acute myocardial infarction.
        Drugs. 1987; 33: 231-234
        • Roth A
        • Barbash GI
        • Hod H
        • et al.
        Should thrombolytic therapy be administered in the mobile intensive care unit in patients with evolving myocardial infarction? A pilot study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15: 932-936
        • Karagounis L
        • Ipsen SK
        • Jessop MR
        • et al.
        Impact of field-transmitted electrocardiography on time to in-hospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.
        Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66: 786-791
        • Grim PS
        • Feldman T
        • Childers RW
        Evaluation of patients for the need of thrombolytic therapy in the prehospital setting.
        Annals Emerg Med. 1989; 18: 483-488
        • Gibler WB
        • Kereiakes DJ
        • Dean EN
        • et al.
        Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A North-South perspective.
        Am Heart J. 1991; 121: 1-11
        • Kennedy JW
        • Weaver WD
        The potential for prehospital thrombolytic therapy.
        Clin Cardiol. 1990; 13: VIII23-VIII26
        • Yusef S
        • Sleight P
        • Held P
        • et al.
        Routine management of acute myocardial infarction; lessons from overviews of recent randomized controlled trials.
        Circulation. 1990; 82 (suppl 2): 11-17
        • Aufderheide TP
        • Haselow WC
        • Robinson NA
        • et al.
        Feasibility of prehospital r-TPA therapy in chest pain patients.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21: 379-383
        • Kudenchuk PJ
        • Ho MT
        • Weaver WD
        • et al.
        Accuracy of computer-interpreted electrocardiography in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 17: 1486-1491
        • O'Rourke MF
        • Cook A
        • Carroll G
        • et al.
        Accuracy of a portable interpretive ECG machine in diagnosis of acute evolving myocardial infarction.
        Aust N Z J Med. 1992; 22: 9-13
        • Elko PP
        • Weaver WD
        • Kudenchuk P
        • et al.
        The dilemma of sensitivity versus specificity in computer-interpreted acute myocardial infarction.
        J Electrocardol. 1992; 24 (suppl): 2-7