Advertisement
Advanced Search

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Figures

Fig. 1

Nitrous oxide versus placebo study profile.

Abstract

The objective was to determine whether an inhaled 50:50 mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen (N2O/O2) provides significant pain and anxiety relief during intravenous cannulation in healthy adults. The study was conducted at the ED of a military teaching hospital. Participants included adult volunteers aged 18 to 50 years. Excluded were those with allergy to N2O, anemia, cardiac disease, pregnancy, asthma, or bone marrow disorder. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design was used comparing a 50:50 mixture of N2O/O2 versus O2. After recording baseline nonhatched 100mm visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and anxiety, subjects inhaled gas 1 for 120 seconds, followed by antecubital intravenous cannulation, discontinuance of gas and VAS rating of procedural pain and anxiety. After 15 minutes, the experiment was repeated with gas 2. Ten subjects would detect a 12mm difference in pain or anxiety with a standard deviation of 10 mm, an alpha error under 0.05 and a power over 80%. Differences between VAS were compared by matched 2-tailed t-test. Eleven subjects were enrolled. One withdrew because of dizziness while inhaling gas (N2O). The 10 remaining subjects reported significantly less pain (N2O/O2 14.5mm, SD 18; O2 34.3mm, SD 23.4; P <.01) and anxiety (N2O/O2 - 7.9mm, SD 7.8; O2 6.0mm, SD 11.6; P <.02) when inhaling N2O/O2 than when inhaling O2 alone. N2O/O2 provided significant pain and anxiety reductions during intravenous cannulation. Some patients may experience adverse perceptions while using N2O, limiting its utility. Further studies defining the role of N2O as an anxiolytic agent, efficacy in actual patients, and cost comparisons with intravenous conscious analgesia/sedation, are warranted. (Am J Emerg Med 2001;19:492-494. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

*The conclusions and opinions reported by the authors do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Defense or the United States Army.

**Address reprint requests to Maj Robert T. Gerhardt, MD, MPH, ATTN: DEM, BAMC, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, San Antonio, TX 78234. E-mail: robert.gerhardt@cen.amedd.army.mil

*This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

**0735-6757/01/1906-0008$0.00/0

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement