Disagreement in the interpretation of electrocardiographic ST segment elevation: a source of error for emergency physicians?
Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting, Wilmington, DE, April 2002, and at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, National Meeting, St. Louis, MO, May 2001.
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
FIGURE 1
Rates of disagreement in the determination of electrocardiographic ST segment elevation by EPs (n = 61).
FIGURE 2
Rates of disagreement in the determination of electrocardiographic ST segment waveform morphology by EPs (n = 61).
Abstract
Evaluation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a complex, subjective process with the potential for interobserver disagreement. The objective of this study was to determine the ECG patterns with discrepant interpretations, the rates of disagreement in the determination of both the presence of ST segment elevation (STE) and morphology. ECGs were reviewed in a retrospective fashion by attending EPs for STE and waveform morphology. Those ECGs that were interpreted in a discrepant fashion were then analyzed to detect patterns of disagreement. ECGs from 599 patients were reviewed. Two hundred eleven patients (35.2% of the total patient population surveyed) had STE as determined by at least one attending EP; 40 (19% of the STE population) patients had STE determined by 1 EP, 21 (10% of the STE population) patients by 2 EPs, and 150 (71% of the STE population) patients by 3 EPs. The STE of 61 (28.9%) ECGs were interpreted in a discrepant fashion. The average STE was 1.31 mm per lead for ECGs with disagreement and 2.93 mm per lead for ECGs with agreement (P < .05). ECGs with reciprocal ST depression were more likely to have agreement with regard to the STE (P < .05). Fourteen ECGs (8.2% of 171 ECGs with STE determined by at least 2 EPs) had ST segment morphology interpreted in a discrepant fashion. Disagreement in the determination of electrocardiographic ST segment elevation by EPs occurs frequently and is related to the amount of STE present on the ECG. Electrocardiographic patterns responsible for this interpretive disagreement of ST segment elevation can represent an unfortunate but potentially predictable source of error in emergency medical care.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
