Real-time paramedic compared with blinded physician identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of an observational study☆
Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine's annual meeting, Chicago, Ill, May 1998.
Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 414 5972; fax: +1 617 414 5975.

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 414 5972; fax: +1 617 414 5975.

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
- Boston Emergency Medical Services, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Affiliations
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Affiliations
- Boston Emergency Medical Services, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Affiliations
- Boston Emergency Medical Services, Boston, MA 02118, USA
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
The aim of the study were to determine if paramedics can accurately identify ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on prehospital 12-lead (PHTL) electrocardiogram and to compare paramedic with blinded physician identification of STEMI. Paramedics identified definite STEMI, or possible acute myocardial infarction but not definite, and nondiagnostic. Two blinded readers (cardiologist and emergency physician) independently categorized each PHTL. A third reviewer assigned final diagnoses and determined whether the PHTL met STEMI criteria. One hundred sixty-six PHTL were acquired over an 8-month period. Fifteen were excluded from analysis. Sixty-two percent of the patients (94/151) were male, mean age was 61.1 years (±14.8 SD, range 20-92 years), and 81% had chest pain. Twenty-five patients (16.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-23.5%) had confirmed STEMI and 16 (10.6%) had confirmed non-STEMI acute myocardial infarction. Paramedic sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.96); specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00) with positive likelihood ratio of 25.2 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.21. Overall accuracy was similar for paramedic and physician reviewers (0.94, 0.93, 0.95). Highly trained paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system can identify patients with STEMI as accurately as blinded physician reviewers.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆This study was supported by the Boston Emergency Physicians Research Fund.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
