Chest radiograph screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome in the ED
Affiliations
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +852 2632 2219; fax: +852 2337 3226.

Affiliations
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +852 2632 2219; fax: +852 2337 3226.

Affiliations
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Affiliations
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Affiliations
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Affiliations
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Affiliations
- Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of chest radiography for the screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). We retrospectively analyzed all patients who attended an Emergency Department SARS screening clinic during the outbreak in Hong Kong, from March 10 to June 5, 2003. Patients with clinical and epidemiologic suspicion of SARS were evaluated by serial chest radiography. All radiographs were reported by consensus from 2 radiologists, blinded to the clinical records. The prevalence of SARS was 13.3% among 1328 patients included. The initial radiograph had sensitivity 50.3%, specificity 95.0%, positive likelihood ratio 10.06, negative likelihood ratio 0.52, positive predictive value 61.5%, and negative predictive value 92.3% for diagnosing SARS. Serial chest radiography had sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 93.9%, positive likelihood ratio 15.48, negative likelihood ratio 0.06, positive predictive value 71.4%, and negative predictive value 99.0%. The initial chest radiograph has poor sensitivity, and serial radiographs are required to rule out SARS.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
