Heparin–platelet factor 4 antibodies in patients presenting to the ED with thrombosis
Affiliations
- Florida Hospital Institute of Translational Research, Orlando, FL 32804, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 407 303-2444; fax: +1 407 303 2441.

Affiliations
- Florida Hospital Institute of Translational Research, Orlando, FL 32804, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 407 303-2444; fax: +1 407 303 2441.

Affiliations
- Florida Hospital Institute of Translational Research, Orlando, FL 32804, USA
Affiliations
- Florida Hospital Institute of Translational Research, Orlando, FL 32804, USA
Affiliations
- Florida Hospital Institute of Translational Research, Orlando, FL 32804, USA
Affiliations
- University of Texas School of Medicine at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
Background
Patients with heparin–platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies, particularly platelet-activating ones, are at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia if administered heparin. We determined the heparin-PF4 antibody prevalence in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain or symptoms of thrombosis.
Methods
Admission samples from 324 ED patients with chest pain or symptoms of thrombosis were tested for heparin-PF4 antibodies and, if positive, platelet-activating antibodies.
Results
Twenty-four (7.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.8%-10.8%) patients had heparin-PF4 antibodies. Seropositivity occurred in 18 (9.2%) of 196 patients recently (≤6 months) hospitalized vs 6 (4.7%) of 128 not recently hospitalized (P = .19), and in 16/231 (6.9%) patients with chest pain vs 8/93 (8.6%) with other thrombosis (P = .64). Of 22 seropositive patients retested, 8 (7 recently hospitalized) had platelet-activating antibodies.
Conclusion
Heparin-PF4 antibody prevalence is 7.4% in ED patients with chest pain or thrombosis, with ∼1 in 3 seropositive patients having platelet-activating antibodies. Alternative, nonheparin anticoagulation would be prudent in these at-risk patients.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Presented at XXth Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis & Haemostasis, Sydney, Australia (August 2005).
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
