Triage flowchart to rule out acute coronary syndrome
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 93 227 9833; fax: +34 93 227 5693.

Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 93 227 9833; fax: +34 93 227 5693.

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Fig. 1
Study profile and patient distribution during the study period. CP indicates chest pain; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; UA, unstable angina; ET, exercise testing.
Fig. 2
The ROC curve of the predictive triage model to rule out ACS.
Fig. 3
Triage decision rule derived from the variables.
Abstract
Aim
The aim of the study was to establish a triage flowchart to rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) among patients with chest pain (CP) arriving on an Emergency Department (ED).
Patients and Method
This prospective observational study included 1000 consecutive patients with CP arriving on an ED CP unit. Demographic and clinical characteristics along with vital signs were recorded as independent variables. After CP unit protocol completion and 1-month follow-up, patients were classified as (dependent variable) (1) true non-ACS (all noncoronary patients at the first visit that kept this condition when called 1 month later) or (2) true ACS (all the remaining patients). Relationship among variables was assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis. A triage flowchart was obtained from significant variables and applied to patients with CP who were then grouped in “triage non-ACS” and “triage ACS.” Validity indexes to exclude ACS for triage flowchart were measured.
Results
Variables significantly associated with non-ACS and included in the triage flowchart were age <40 years (odds ratio 3.61, 95% CI 1.63-7.99), absence of diabetes (2.74, 1.53-4.88), no previously known coronary artery disease (5.46, 3.42-8.71), nonoppressive pain (10.63, 6.04-18.70), and nonretrosternal pain (5.16, 2.82-9.42). For the triage flowchart, both specificity and positive predictive value to rule out ACS were 100%.
Conclusions
The triage flowchart is able to accurately identify patients with CP not having an ACS. It may help triage nurses make quick decisions on who should be immediately seen and who could safely wait when delays in medical attention are unavoidable. Prospective validation is needed.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
