R = 20: bias in the reporting of respiratory rates
Shivani Gupta

,x
, Mukkamala MDShivani Gupta
Search for articles by this author
Affiliations
- The Virginia Commonwealth University, Internal Medicine, PO Box 980663, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author.

x
Shivani Gupta
Search for articles by this author
Affiliations
- The Virginia Commonwealth University, Internal Medicine, PO Box 980663, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author.

Chris Gennings, PhD
, Richard P. Wenzel, MD, MSc
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Fig. 1
Respiratory rate reporting.
The respiratory rate is a valuable component of patients' vital signs. Abnormal rates may indicate direct cardiopulmonary diseases, adverse responses to drugs, and compensating responses to acid-base abnormalities. Furthermore, a rate of more than 20 is 1 of the 4 defined criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The other 3 SIRS criteria include a temperature higher than 38°C or lower than 36°C; pulse of more than 90/min; and a white blood cell count of more than 12 × 109/L, less than 4 × 109/L, or with more than 10% bands [1].
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
© 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Access this article on
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
