Advertisement

ED management of pediatric syncope: searching for a rationale

      Abstract

      Objective

      The aim of this study was to evaluate emergency department (ED) management of childhood syncope, focusing on diagnostic tests ordered, whether a reason for specific testing was recorded, and hospital admission rates.

      Methods

      We reviewed ED records of patients aged 5 to 20 years who presented to a community hospital ED with syncope or near-syncope over a 1-year period (April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2005). Patient charts were nonelectronic (paper). We reviewed the elements of the recorded history and physical examination for each patient. The specific tests ordered in the ED were classified into 3 general testing categories for each patient as follows: (1) simple testing, with a hospital charge of $100 or less per test; (2) expanded testing, more than $100 per test, with a recorded explanation; and (3) expanded testing without a recorded explanation.

      Results

      The charts of 140 patients were reviewed. Of these, we excluded 27 based on exclusion criteria, including history of neurologic disorders. The mean age of the remaining 113 patients was 14.8 ± 3.3 years. Most (80%) presented with syncope; 20% had near-syncope. Ten percent were admitted to the hospital, over half for an electrocardiogram (ECG) interpreted as abnormal by an ECG machine and/or the ED staff. Overall, 17.5% of patients had simple testing, 32.5% had expanded testing with explanation, and 50% had expanded testing without explanation. Patients with syncope were more likely than patients with near-syncope to be in the expanded testing category (P < .008). The most commonly ordered tests in the ED in order of decreasing frequency were electrolytes (90%), ECG (85%), complete blood count (80%), urinalysis, urinary drug screen, or urinary human chorionic gonadotropin (76%), head computed tomography (CT, 58%), and chest x-ray (37%). The most expensive of these tests was the head CT; all head CT results were negative.

      Conclusions

      A relatively high number of our subjects were admitted (10%), most often because of questions raised by the ECG. Although an ECG is widely recommended for pediatric syncope presenting to the ED, this suggests that ECG interpretation by a pediatric cardiologist would be helpful before the decision to admit is made. In addition, 58% of our subjects had a head CT in the ED; all CT results were negative. This high percentage of head CTs for pediatric syncope has not been previously reported.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D; use, select 'Corporate R&D; Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ganzeboom K.S.
        • Colman N.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Shen W.K.
        • Wieling W.
        Prevalence and triggers for syncope in medical students.
        Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 1006-1008
        • Chronister T.E.
        Pediatric neurologist as consultant in evaluation of syncope in infants and children: when to refer.
        Prog Pediatric Cardiology. August 2001; 13: 133-138
        • Tanel R.E.
        • Walsh E.P.
        Syncope in the pediatric patient.
        Cardiology Clinics. May 1997; 15: 277-294
        • Driscoll D.J.
        • Jacobsen S.J.
        • Porter C.J.
        • Wollan P.C.
        Syncope in children and adolescents.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1039-1045
        • Massin M.M.
        • Malekzadeh-Milani S.
        • Benatar A.
        Cardiac syncope in pediatric patients.
        Clin Cardiol. 2007; 30: 81-85
        • Wieling W.
        • Ganzeboom K.S.
        • Saul J.P.
        Reflex syncope in children and adolescents.
        Heart. 2004; 90: 1094-1100
        • Gordon T.A.
        • Moodie D.X.
        • Passalacqua M.
        • Sterba R.
        • Rothner A.D.
        • Erenberg G.
        • et al.
        A retrospective analysis of the cost-effective workup of syncope in children.
        Clev Clin J Med. 1987; 54: 391-394
        • Lerman-Sagie T.
        • Lerman P.
        • Mukamel M.
        • Blieden L.
        • Mimouni M.
        A prospective evaluation of pediatric patients with syncope.
        Clin Pediatr. 1994; 33: 67-70
        • Ritter S.
        • Tani L.Y.
        • Etheridge S.P.
        • Williams R.V.
        • Craig J.E.
        • Minich L.
        What is the yield of screening echocardiography in pediatric syncope?.
        Pediatrics. 2000; 105: e58-e60
      1. Marx: Rosen's emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice. 5th ed. Mosby, Inc, 2002
      2. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope—update 2004. Available at: http://www.guideline.gov/. Bibliographic source: Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG, et al. Europace 2004;6(6):467-537

        • Horton L.A.
        • Mosee S.
        • Brenner J.
        Use of the electrocardiogram in a pediatric emergency department.
        Arch Peidatr Adolesc Med. 1994; 148: 184-188
        • Wathen J.E.
        • Rewers A.B.
        • Yetman A.T.
        • Schaffer M.S.
        Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46: 507-511
        • Massin M.
        • Bourguignont A.
        • Coremans C.
        • Comte L.
        • Lepage P.
        • Gerard P.
        Syncope in pediatric patients presenting to an emergency department.
        Journal of Pediatrics. August 2004; 145: 223-228
        • Steinberg L.
        • Knilans T.K.
        Syncope in children: diagnostic tests have a high cost and low yield.
        Journal of Pediatrics. March 2005; : 355-358
        • Sinuff T.
        • Kahnamoui K.
        • Cook D.
        • et al.
        Practice guidelines as multipurpose tools: a qualitative study of noninvasive ventilation.
        Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 776-782
        • Mehta R.H.
        The impact of emergency department structure and care processes in delivering care for non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
        Am Heart J. 2006; 152: 648-660