Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
Correspondence
Corresponding author. Department of Trauma, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 73125895x7553; fax: +886 73208255.
Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
Correspondence
Corresponding author. Department of Trauma, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 73125895x7553; fax: +886 73208255.
1The first 2 authors have equal contribution in this work and are both equally considered as first author.
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription.
Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Figures
Fig. 1
The NEXUS criteria.
Fig. 2
Proposed algorithm for prehospital spinal immobilization patients with spinal injuries after urban lightweight motorcycle accident.
Abstract
Background
Cervical collar brace protection of the cervical spine at the scene of the incident is the first priority for emergency medical technicians treating patients who have sustained trauma. However, there is still controversy between over- or underprotection. The objective of this study was to survey the cervical spine injury of lightweight motorcycle accident victims and further evaluate the neck collar protection policy.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients who sustained lightweight motorcycle injuries, assumed to have been at a low velocity, with incidence of cervical spine damage, from a single medical center's trauma registration from 2008 to 2009. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who were immobilized by cervical collar brace and those who were not.
Results
Of the 8633 motorcycle crash victims, 63 patients had cervical spine injury. The average of the injury severity score in these patients was 14.31 ± 8.25. There was no significant correlation of cervical spine injury between the patients who had had the neck collar applied and those who had not (χ2, P = .896). The length of stay in intensive care unit was longer in the patients who had the neck collar applied, but the total hospital length of stay was not statistically different to the patients who did not have the neck collar applied.
Conclusion
The incidence of cervical spinal injuries in the urban area lightweight motorcyclists is very low. Prehospital protocol for application of a cervical collar brace to people who have sustained a lightweight motorcycle accident in the urban area should be revised to avoid unnecessary restraint and possible complications.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Article Info