New video laryngoscope devices have been proposed to improve airway management in
the emergency services [
[1]
]. However, most of the studies performed compared video laryngoscopes with a standard
laryngoscope [
2
,
3
].To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D; use, select 'Corporate R&D; Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Videolaryngoscopes: do they truly have roles in difficult airways?.Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 515-517
- Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions.Anesthesiology. 2011; 114: 34-41
- Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 629-636
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: March 06, 2014
Accepted:
February 25,
2014
Received in revised form:
February 25,
2014
Received:
January 25,
2014
Footnotes
☆Authors' contribution: Conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data: Burçin Güvenç Yanık, Sadiye Yolcu, and İsmet Parlak; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content: Gizem Aydınok, Serhat Akay, and Vermi Değerli; final approval of the version to be published: Sadiye Yolcu, Mucahit Kapçı, Önder Tomruk, Bülent Erdur, and İsmet Parlak.
☆☆All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Identification
Copyright
© 2014 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
