Advertisement
Advanced Search

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of facial trauma among victims of road traffic accidents and investigate factors associated with it.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out using the medical and dental charts of 2570 victims of road traffic accidents with bodily and/or facial injuries between 2008 and 2011. Sociodemographic variables of the victims and characteristics of the accidents and injuries were evaluated. Statistical analyses included the χ2 test as well as the Poisson univariate and multivariate regression analyses for the determination of the final hierarchical model.

Results

The prevalence of facial injuries was 16.4%. Most of the victims were male. Among the victims with facial injuries, 44.3% had polytrauma to the face. The prevalence of facial injuries was high among accidents that occurred at night (Prevalence Ratio (PR), 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.84; P = .007) and victims up to 9 years of age (PR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.03-5.17; P = .041). Moreover, the prevalence of facial injuries was lower among victims of motorcycle accidents than victims of automobile accidents (PR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89; P = .001).

Conclusion

The prevalence of facial injuries was high in this study and was significantly associated with the place of residence, time of day, age group, and type of accident.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

Sources of support: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPQ) and Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba (FAPESQ).

☆☆Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Funding from the Brazilian funding agencies Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPQ) and Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado da Paraíba (FAPESQ) had no influence on the study design, data collection and analysis, editorial decisions, or the drafting of the manuscript.

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement