Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study☆
Affiliations
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Emergency Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Pabianicka 62 St, 93-513 Lodz, Poland. Tel.: +48 501 306 238.

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Disaster Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Emergency Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Pabianicka 62 St, 93-513 Lodz, Poland. Tel.: +48 501 306 238.

Affiliations
- Department of Cardiosurgery and Transplantology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Figure
Time to successfully perform the intraosseous access by each device.
Abstract
Background
The study was designed to investigate the success rate and time of insertion intraosseous access during simulated resuscitation.
Material and methods
This was a randomized crossover study involving 107 paramedics. They were timed from start of insertion attempt to successful insertion and asked to score perceived difficulty of intraosseus access devices. Bone injection gun (BIG) (WaisMed Company, Houston, TX), EZ-IO (Vidacare, Shavano Park, TX) and Jamshidi (Carefusion, San Diego, CA) were used in this study.
Results
Success rates for first intraosseus iniecition attempt were higher for the BIG (91.59%) than EX-IO (82.66%) or Jamshidi (47.66%). Mean procedure time was 2.0 ± 0.7 vs 3.1 ± 0.9 minutes for EZ-IO vs 4.2 ± 1.0 minutes for Jamshidi.
Conclusions
The use of BIG is associated with excellent success rates for insertion and appears easier to use than EZ-IO or Jamshidi Intraosseus Needle. Further work to evaluate the use of the intraosseus access device in the emergency medical services is required.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Conflict of interest declaration: none.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
