Advertisement
Advanced Search
To read this article in full, please review your options for gaining access at the bottom of the page.

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

It appears that there is benefit with thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism (PE) [1,2]. In cardiac arrest the evidence is inconclusive although there is a robust biological rationale [1,2]. TROICA (Thrombolysis for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest), a large double-blinded randomized placebo controlled trial showed no difference in 30-day mortality between thrombolysis and placebo group [3]. However, anti-thrombotics and salicylates weren't given with the fibrinolytic agent in the TROICA trial, and multiple case reports and animal studies in the literature did show benefit in return of spontaneous circulation and neurological outcome in subjects given thrombolysis [4,5].

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement