Which out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients should be thrombolysed?
Noosa Hospital, ICU, Queensland, Australia
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
Noosa Hospital, ICU, Queensland, Australia
Article Info
Publication History
Published Online: February 12, 2016Accepted: February 3, 2016; Received in revised form: February 2, 2016; Received: January 17, 2016;
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
It appears that there is benefit with thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism (PE) [1,2]. In cardiac arrest the evidence is inconclusive although there is a robust biological rationale [1,2]. TROICA (Thrombolysis for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest), a large double-blinded randomized placebo controlled trial showed no difference in 30-day mortality between thrombolysis and placebo group [3]. However, anti-thrombotics and salicylates weren't given with the fibrinolytic agent in the TROICA trial, and multiple case reports and animal studies in the literature did show benefit in return of spontaneous circulation and neurological outcome in subjects given thrombolysis [4,5].
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
© 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Access this article on
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
