Advertisement
Advanced Search

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

I read with great interest the letter by Nishant and colleagues [1] in response to the meta-analysis by Akihisa and colleagues [2] regarding the effects of sniffing position for tracheal intubation. Nishant and colleagues suggested that changes in glottic exposure due to positioning are likely to be subtle and that the vast majority of the Cormack Lehane grades are the same in either position. Therefore, using this scale, one position may not prove to be better than the other despite it giving consistently better exposures when compared with the other.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

Institutional affiliation: none.

☆☆Reprints: none.

☆☆☆Financial disclosures: none.

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement