Advanced Search
To read this article in full, please review your options for gaining access at the bottom of the page.

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Figures

Fig. 1

The number of hanging patients and neurologic outcome

ED, emergency department; DOA, death on arrival; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; CPC, cerebral performance category.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to identify the neurologic outcome of hanging patients and prognostic factors.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively investigated comatose hanging patients who arrived at the emergency departments (EDs) of twelve academic tertiary care centers during a period of seven years (2006–2012). Patients were analyzed separately according to whether out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurred or not. The neurologic outcome was evaluated using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) at the time of hospital discharge.

Results

A total of 1118 patients were admitted to the ED after hanging attempts. There were 159 comatose patients who did not experience OHCA. Twelve (7.5%) of 159 patients were discharged from the hospital with a poor neurologic outcome (CPC 3–5). These 12 patients received only conservative management without therapeutic hypothermia. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, mental state upon ED arrival and arterial pH were predicting factors for poor prognosis. One hundred twenty-one patients suffered OHCA and experienced restored spontaneous circulation after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among them, only five (4.1%) patients recovered consciousness to the level of CPC 1–2. The initial arterial pH and HCO3 were prognostic factors in hanging patients with OHCA.

Conclusions

Even though cardiac arrest did not occur after hanging injuries, 7.5% of patients could not recover consciousness. Therapeutic hypothermia should be considered for such patients. If OHCA occurred after the hanging injury, the proportion of patients with good neurologic outcome was very low at 4.1%.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

Notes: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

 

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement