Obtaining intravascular access in a pediatric patient with hypovolemic shock caused
by bleeding, vomiting, diarrhea, or severe dehydration or with sudden cardiac arrest
in a prehospital setting can be difficult for medical personnel, and a delay in parenteral
access can be associated with higher morbidity
[
[1]
]. Therefore, intraosseous infusion is an adequate alternative to parenteral access.
Although many puncture sites are described in literature, the tibial bone seems a
preferred location for intraosseous infusion in emergency care
[
1
,
2
]. A recently published study proposed the Doppler ultrasound technique to confirm
intraosseous flow after intraosseous needle placement. It can also verify whether
the intraosseous device is still adequately functioning after transportation or patient
positioning
[
[3]
]. In a conscious patient, pain on puncture might become an issue—then analgesia with
lidocaine should be considered. Prior studies reported osteomyelitis as a most serious
complication (0.6%)
[
[4]
]. Hansen et al
[
[4]
] described a 0.4% incidence rate for osteomyelitis in 1802 patients. On the other
hand, intraosseous infusion has proved easy to learn and to perform
[
1
,
5
] and offers a wide range of advantages
[
[2]
], combined with a relatively low rate of severe complications
[
6
,
- Szarpak L
- Truszewski Z
- Smereka J
- Krajewski P
- Fudalej M
- Adamczyk P
- et al.
A randomized cadaver study comparing first-attempt success between tibial and humeral
intraosseous insertions using NIO device by paramedics: a preliminary investigation.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95e3724https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003724
7
].To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D; use, select 'Corporate R&D; Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Success of intraosseous access procedure in simulated adult resuscitation.Crit Care Resusc. 2016; 18: 134
- The intraosseous access devices as a method of vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34: 321-322https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.013
- Feasibility of point-of-care colour Doppler ultrasound confirmation of intraosseous needle placement during resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 665-668
- Intraosseous line use, complications, and outcomes among a population-based cohort of children presenting to California hospitals.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011; 27: 928-932
- Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study.Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 32: 1490-1493https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.007
- A randomized cadaver study comparing first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions using NIO device by paramedics: a preliminary investigation.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95e3724https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003724
- Ability of paramedics to perform intraosseous access. A randomized cadaver study comparing EZ-IO(®) and NIO(®) devices.Resuscitation. 2016; 104: e5-e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.04.011
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: June 17, 2016
Accepted:
June 15,
2016
Received:
June 15,
2016
Footnotes
☆Source of support: No sources of financial and material support to be declared.
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.