Advertisement

Pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in the emergency department, an evidence based approach

Published:October 14, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158503

      Abstract

      Introduction

      A great deal of the literature has focused specifically on true pulseless electrical activity (PEA), whereas there is a dearth of research regarding pseudo-PEA. This narrative review evaluates the diagnosis and management of patients in pseudo-PEA and discusses the impact on emerging patient outcomes.

      Discussion

      Pseudo-PEA can be defined as evidence of cardiac activity without a detectable pulse. Distinguishing pseudo-PEA from true PEA is important for emergency physicians as the prognosis and management of these patients differ. POCUS is the tool most commonly used to diagnose pseudo-PEA and there are varying treatment strategies to manage these patients. Identifying patients in pseudo-PEA can help guide resuscitation decisions, and ultimately impact emergency response systems, patients, and families.

      Conclusions

      The incidence of pseudo-PEA is increasing. Effective care of these patients begins with early diagnosis of this condition and immediate treatment to warrant the greatest chance of survival. There is a need for further prospective studies surrounding pseudo-PEA as evidenced by the lack of research in the current literature.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D; use, select 'Corporate R&D; Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Paradis N.A.
        • Martin G.B.
        • Goetting M.G.
        • Rivers E.P.
        • Feingold M.
        • Nowak R.M.
        Aortic pressure during human cardiac arrest: identification of pseudo-electromechanical dissociation.
        Chest. 1992; 101: 123-128
        • Kohn R.M.
        Myocardial oxygen uptake during ventricular fibrillation and electromechanical dissociation.
        Am J Cardiol. 1963; 11: 483-486
        • Tayal V.S.
        • Kline J.A.
        Emergency echocardiography to detect pericardial effusion in patients in PEA and near-PEA states.
        Resuscitation. 2003; 59: 315-318
        • Mehta C.
        • Brady W.
        Pulseless electrical activity in cardiac arrest: electrocardiographic presentations and management considerations based on the electrocardiogram.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 236-239
        • Väyrynen T.
        • Kuisma M.
        • Määttä T.
        • Boyd J.
        Who survives from out-of-hospital pulseless electrical activity?.
        Resuscitation. 2008; 76: 207-213
        • Desbiens N.A.
        Simplifying the diagnosis and management of pulseless electrical activity in adults: a qualitative review.
        Crit Care Med. 2008; 36: 391-396
        • Myerburg R.J.
        • Halperin H.
        • Egan D.A.
        • et al.
        Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
        Circulation. 2013; 128: 2532-2541
        • Engdahl J.
        • Bång A.
        • Lindqvist J.
        • Herlitz J.
        Factors affecting short-and long-term prognosis among 1069 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and pulseless electrical activity.
        Resuscitation. 2001; 51: 17-25
        • Bergum D.
        • Skjeflo G.W.
        • Nordseth T.
        • et al.
        ECG patterns in early pulseless electrical activity-associations with aetiology and survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Resuscitation. 2016; 104: 34-39
        • Salen P.
        • Melniker L.
        • Chooljian C.
        • et al.
        Does the presence or absence of sonographically identified cardiac activity predict resuscitation outcomes of cardiac arrest patients?.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2005; 23: 459-462
        • Teran F.
        • Dean A.J.
        • Centeno C.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using transesophageal echocardiography in the emergency department.
        Resuscitation. 2019; 137: 140-147
        • Larabee T.M.
        • Little C.M.
        • Raju B.I.
        • et al.
        A novel hands-free carotid ultrasound detects low-flow cardiac output in a swine model of pulseless electrical activity arrest.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011; 29: 1141-1146
        • Zengin S.
        • Gumuboga H.
        • Sabak M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of manual pulse palpation, cardiac ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography to check the pulse in cardiopulmonary arrest patients.
        Resuscitation. 2018; 133: 59-64
        • Prosen G.
        • Križmarić M.
        • Završnik J.
        • Grmec Š.
        Impact of modified treatment in echocardiographically confirmed pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with constant end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure during compression pauses.
        J Int Med Res. 2010; 38: 1458-1467
        • Hogan T.S.
        External cardiac compression may be harmful in some scenarios of pulseless electrical activity.
        Med Hypotheses. 2012; 79: 445-447
        • Paradis N.A.
        • Halperin H.R.
        • Zviman M.
        • et al.
        Coronary perfusion pressure during external chest compression in pseudo-EMD, comparison of systolic versus diastolic synchronization.
        Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 1287-1291
        • Chardoli M.
        • Heidari F.
        • Shuang-ming S.
        • et al.
        Echocardiography integrated ACLS protocol versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest.
        Chin J Traumatol. 2012; 15: 284-287
        • Flato U.A.
        • Paiva E.F.
        • Carballo M.T.
        • et al.
        Echocardiography for prognostication during the resuscitation of intensive care unit patients with non-shockable rhythm cardiac arrest.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 92: 1-6
        • Wu C.
        • Zheng Z.
        • Jiang L.
        • et al.
        The predictive value of bedside ultrasound to restore spontaneous circulation in patients with pulseless electrical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PloS one. 2018; 13: e0191636
        • Attin M.
        • Tucker R.G.
        • Carey M.G.
        In-hospital cardiac arrest: an update on pulseless electrical activity and asystole.
        Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2016; 28: 387-397
        • Huis in 't Veld M.A.
        • Allison M.G.
        • Bostick D.S.
        • Fisher K.R.
        • Goloubeva O.G.
        • Witting M.D.
        • Winters M.E.
        Ultrasound use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with delays in chest compressions.
        Resuscitation. 2017; 119: 95-98https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.021
        • Littmann L.
        • Bustin D.J.
        • Haley M.W.
        A simplified and structured teaching tool for the evaluation and management of pulseless electrical activity.
        Med Princ Pract. 2014; 23: 1-6