Intubation success rates improve for an air medical program after implementing the use of neuromuscular blocking agents☆
Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
- Carolina Air Care, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Correspondence
- Address reprint requests to Dr Ma, Department of Emergency Medicine, Campus Box #7594, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7594.

Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
- Carolina Air Care, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Correspondence
- Address reprint requests to Dr Ma, Department of Emergency Medicine, Campus Box #7594, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7594.
Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Affiliations
- Carolina Air Care, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Affiliations
- Pegasus Flight Operations, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville. USA
Affiliations
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville. USA
Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville. USA
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
To determine whether the success rate for endotracheal intubation improves after implementing the use of neuromuscular blocking (NMB) agents in an air medical program, this retrospective study analyzed all patients requiring endotracheal intubation at two air medical programs (nurse/paramedic crews) over a 5-year period. Air medical program A, the control group, had employed NMB agents throughout the entire study period. Air medical program B, which did not use NMB agents from July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1992, implemented their use starting July 1, 1992. For program A, the overall intubation success rate was 93.5% (202 successful intubations in 216 patients) and the successful intubations/total attempts ratio was 0.67 (202 of 301). For program B, the overall intubation success rate improved from 66.7% (46 successful intubations in 69 patients) before NMB agent use to 90.5% (57 in 63) after NMB agent use (P = .001). The successful intubations/total attempts ratio increased from 0.36 (51 of 141) prior to NMB agent use to 0.48 (63 of 132) after NMB agent use (P = NS). In comparing the 92 patients who did not receive NMB agents to the 40 patients who did, the intubation success rate increased from 69.6% (64 of 92) to 97.5% (39 of 40) (P < .001) and the successful intubation/total attempts ratio increased from 0.36 (73 of 202) to 0.58 (41 of 71) (P = .007). With the use of NMB agents, program B's overall intubation success rate increased significantly, matching the results of program A.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Presented at the 1995 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, May 24, 1995, San Antonio, TX.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
