Plain abdominal radiographs and abdominal CT scans for nontraumatic abdominal pain—Added value?☆
Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
- the Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. USA
Correspondence
- Address reprint requests to Dr Nagurney, Clinics 117, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.

Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
- the Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. USA
Correspondence
- Address reprint requests to Dr Nagurney, Clinics 117, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
- the Division of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. USA
Affiliations
- the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston. USA
Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
Affiliations
- From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective descriptive study to determine the value of plain abdominal radiographs in emergency department (ED) patients also receiving abdominal computed tomography scans (CT) for the evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal, back and flank pain (NTAP). Cases were identified through radiology log books. Medical records and radiology reports were reviewed to determine whether the CT confirmed the findings of the plain abdominal radiographs, and whether the clinical course confirmed the results of either. Test characteristics for the plain abdominal radiograph and for the CT, using the clinical course including subsequent invasive procedures as the gold standard, were calculated. Of 177 patients who received CTs, 97 (55%) also received plain abdominal radiographs. Among the 74 patients who were admitted to the hospital and had complete data, the sensitivity and specificity for the plain abdominal radiographs were .43 and .75 respectively, compared to .91 and .94 for the CT scan (Psens. < .05, Pspec. < .05). In 4 patients (5%), both studies failed to identify pathology shown in a subsequent procedure. In ED patients with NTAP, the plain abdominal radiograph may have some value as a screening tool; however, in patients in whom a CT is likely to be ordered anyway, a plain abdominal radiograph is unhelpful and often misleading.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Presented at the 1997 ACEP Research Forum, San Francisco, CA, October, 1997.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
